The Clermont City Council Chambers were packed on Tuesday, January 28, as members of the Lake County Rowing Association (LCRA) and their supporters gathered to voice concerns about the future of their boathouse. Rowers passionately urged city officials to approve an agreement that would allow them to continue using the facility they have called home for years.
The uncertainty began as the city’s management agreement with the LCRA neared expiration. Mayor Tim Murry acknowledged he was aware of the contract’s timeline and had expected a routine renewal. However, he was surprised to receive a letter indicating that other groups were seeking approval to use the boathouse, leading the council to consider alternative offers.
“I was surprised that a short-term agreement extension would be placed on the consent agenda,” Mayor Murry stated, explaining that such an important issue warranted further discussion. The consent agenda is typically reserved for routine, non-controversial matters that do not require extensive deliberation.
The proposed short-term agreement would extend the LCRA’s contract through July 31, 2025, allowing city officials additional time to explore long-term management options for the boathouse. Financially, revenue from the agreement has already been accounted for in the city’s fiscal year 2025 budget. However, this short-term extension does not align with the LCRA’s needs as they prepare for their competitive season.
Tensions ran high as rowers and community members called for greater transparency in the decision-making process, expressing concerns that financial motives were being prioritized over community interests. Some also voiced frustration over City Manager Van Wagner’s involvement, noting his previous mayoral campaign against Murry and questioning his leadership qualifications.
For many rowers, the boathouse represents more than just a facility—it is a second home. Olivia C., a recreational rower and former high school team member, shared her personal connection to the space. “Losing the Boathouse would be like losing a second home. This goes for both my team and me. A lot of us depend on rowing to get us out of the house and help us stay fit. Most of us have been rowing for years, if not more. Personally, I’ve been rowing for six. Without rowing, I would lose one of my favorite activities, and so would my team!”
The boathouse debate is the latest in a series of disputes over city-managed community spaces, including CPAC and the Historic Village. Many residents are increasingly concerned about how public resources are allocated and managed.
By the end of the heated discussion, several council members appeared to waver under the weight of public pressure. However, the future of the LCRA and its boathouse remains uncertain. The next opportunity for discussion will take place at a city workshop on Tuesday, February 4, at 5 p.m. at the Clermont City Center, where stakeholders will have another chance to advocate for their vision of Clermont’s recreational future.
Comments